Administrative Investigation Statistical Summary

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT

 
    Welcome
    Mission Statement
    Organization
    Directory
    Statistics
    Annual Report
    Regional Commands
    Central
    Mission Valley
    Northeast
    Pebble Hills
    Westside
    ASD
    Auto Theft
    Communications
    CAC
    CAP
    CID
    Financial Crimes
    Homeland Security
    SIG
    Special Victims Unit
    SSD
    Records
    Crime Reporting
    Graffiti Reporting
    Abandoned Auto       Reporting
    YIP
    Helpline Directory
    SHOCAP
    Police Explorers
    YIP Newsletter
    Advisory Boards
    Alarm Detail
    Code Watch
    Cold Case Files
    STI Cold Case Files
    Fax Force!
    Gang Injunctions
    Human Trafficking
    NeighborhoodWatch
    Newsletters
    Sex Offenders
    Stash House
    Street Humps
    Vehicles for Hire        •Complaint Form     YIP
    History Main Page
    In Memoriam
    Past Police Chiefs
    Historic Group Pics
    Misc Historic Pics
    Sep 11 Tribute
    Ranks & Badges
    Recruiting Division
    Requirements
    Job Descriptions
    Application Process
    Salary/Benefits
    Training
    Job Opportunities
    Women in Policing
    Important Dates
    Lateral Transfer


CALEA


 
Emergency   911

Non-
Emergency  832-4400

EL PASO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Administrative Investigation Statistical Summary
Year: 2007

 

 

Civil Rights Violations

Criminal Offenses

Use of Force Complaints

Policy Violations

Unfounded

1

9

22

21

Exonerated

0

4

38

20

Not Sustained

5

34

233

385

Sustained

0

8

6

295

Pending Cases

3

23

88

150

No Further Action Taken

0

5

1

19

TOTAL

9

83

388

890

Summary: The El Paso Police Department has completed 612 administrative investigations from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007. Data was retrieved from IAPro as of 01-08-08.

Definitions:

1.   Unfounded.  The allegation concerned an act by a Department employee which did not occur.

2.   Not Sustained.  The investigation failed to produce a preponderance of evidence to either prove or disprove the allegation.

3.   Exonerated.  The allegation did, in fact, occur but the actions of the Department employee were legal, justified, proper, and in conformity with Department policies and procedures.

4.   Sustained.  The investigation produced a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation of an act which was determined to constitute misconduct.

5.   No Further Action Taken.   The investigation was ended due to contractual reasons: resignation or for other means where an investigation could not be completed.

print-version   


| Disclaimer | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Security Policy | Link Policy |
| Tools | Contact Us | Directions to City Hall | Employees | © 2008 City of El Paso | Webmail |

THE CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS Home Government Residents Business Visitors Departments Online Services Meetings Search THE CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS - www.elpasotexas.gov